Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 SW3D 868 - Smith v. State

Smith v. State’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Apprendi v. New Jersey · Ashe v. Swenson · Trop v. Dulles · Doerr v. Doerr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he present standards of decency do not deem cruel and unusual the delay occasioned while a condemned prisoner pursues direct appeals and collateral relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.