Boyter v. Commissioner’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
1 federal appellate ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently November 2017
1 federal appellate ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 8101 (Attendant Allowance Adjustment Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 8301
Relies on Pennoyer v. Neff · Sosna v. Iowa · Commissioner of Internal Revenue v. Estate J Bosch Second National Bank of New Haven · Hilton v. Guyot · Lucas v. Earl
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the law in Maryland with regard to the recognition of migratory divorces obtained in a foreign country by Maryland domiciliaries has not been explicitly declared by either the legislature or the highest court of that state,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“47 Fordham L.Rev. 27 (1978). An in-depth discussion of the problems presented is found in Bittker,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“For a good introduction to the problem of the marriage penalty, see Gerzog,”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.