Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 U.S. 506 - Ex parte McCardle

Ex parte McCardle’s Empirical Analysis

74 U.S. 506 · 1868

Citation profile

1,260
cited by 1,260 later decisions
78
cited 78 times by the Supreme Court
34
states following
February 2026
most recently cited

338 federal appellate · 164 district · 112 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 1,260 later decisions (78 by the Supreme Court) — most recently February 2026 · most notably Fay v. Noia (1963), Flast v. Cohen (1968)

338 federal appellate · 164 district · 112 state decisions — followed in 34 states

390018681870188018901900191019201930194019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Yeaton v. The United States

Cited together with Steel Co. v. Citizens for a Better Environment · Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · McNutt v. General Motors Acceptance Corp. · Bell Atlantic Corp. v. Twombly · United States v. Sherwood

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1,260 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Without jurisdiction the court cannot proceed at all in any cause. Jurisdiction is power to declare the law, and when it ceases to exist, the only function remaining to the court is that of announcing the fact and dismissing the cause.”
    75 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[J]udicial duty is not less fitly performed by declining ungranted jurisdiction than in exercising firmly that which the Constitution and the laws confer.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[t]he Judicial power of the United States shall not be construed to extend to any suit in law or equity commenced or prosecuted against one of the United States by Citizens or Subjects of any Foreign State.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.