Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 Utah 46 - Hurd v. Ford

Hurd v. Ford’s Empirical Analysis

1929

Citation profile

13
cited by 13 later decisions
2
states following
February 1984
most recently cited

13 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 13 later decisions — most recently February 1984

13 state decisions

401929193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Landwehr v. Gillette · Alexander v. McDow · Plummer v. Weil · Wilson v. Salt Lake City · St. Louis S. F. R. Co. v. Zumwalt

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 13 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Or in case an appeal is taken before the bill of exceptions is settled service of the notice aforesaid shall not be necessary (to start the time to run) and the appellant shall, within thirty days after service of his notice of appeal, prepare a draft of a bill and serve the same, or a copy thereof, upon the adverse party.” (Parenthetical phrase added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.