74 Wash. 2d 185 - State v. Cadena’s Empirical Analysis
1968
Citation profile
29 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 29 later decisions — most recently April 2004 · most notably 85 Wash. 2d 758 - State v. Gosby (1975), 78 Wash. 2d 121 - State v. Golladay (1970)
29 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Massiah v. United States · Hoffa v. United States · Ungar v. Sarafite · Lopez v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 29 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Insofar as appellant suggests that the state should have been required to elect between these alternatives, we again cannot agree. The statute spells out different means by which the crime is committed, and the state, under these circumstances and within the bounds of the evidence adduced, is entitled to an instruction on these 'alternatives. See State v. Pettit, 74 Wash. 510, 520 , 133 Pac. 1014 (1913).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“A motion for a continuance is addressed to the sound discretion of the trial court and appellant must show abuse of that discretion.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.