Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 Wash. 2d 200 - State v. Niblack

74 Wash. 2d 200 - State v. Niblack’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

19
cited by 19 later decisions
1
states following
October 2012
most recently cited

19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 19 later decisions — most recently October 2012

19 state decisions

130196819701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 60 Wash. 2d 551 - State v. White · 60 Wash. 2d 21 - State v. Johnson · 73 Wash. 2d 67 - State v. Miles · 70 Wash. 2d 955 - State v. Green · 67 Wash. 2d 45 - State v. Suleski

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 19 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There is another class of cases in which evidence of misconduct of the defendant may be received. That class includes cases which involve other criminal acts which are an inseparable part of the whole deed. [Cases cited.] Such evidence is not open to the objections which justify exclusion of other unrelated crimes. It does not raise the possibility that the jury will condemn the defendant, although he.is. innocent .of the act charged,- because it is prejudiced by his former crimes; and the defendant can not claim surprise, because the misconduct is an integral part of the crime charged.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “We are cited no. authority for the proposition that the prosecutor must anticipate the evidence which a defendant will offer in support of his affirmative defenses and tender a list of the witnesses which it will call to rebut that evidence, nor are we given a rationale to support such a rule.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(1) motive, (2) intent, (3) the absence of accident or mistake, (4) a common scheme or plan, or (5) identity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.