Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 Wash. 2d 736 - Rogstad v. Rogstad

74 Wash. 2d 736 - Rogstad v. Rogstad’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
4
states following
March 2005
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently March 2005

23 state decisions

11019681970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 61 Wash. 2d 772 - State Ex Rel. Humiston v. Meyers · 29 Wash. 2d 650 - Kellerher v. Porter · 72 Wash. 2d 404 - DeRuwe v. DeRuwe · 68 Wash. 2d 573 - Stacy v. Stacy · 60 Wash. 2d 91 - Hein v. Family Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The traditional rule is that courts may take judicial notice of facts which are within the common knowledge of the community. The modern trend seems to have enlarged this conception to state that a fact may be noticed if it is verifiably certain by reference to competent, authoritative sources. This court has accepted the broadened scope of judicial notice. State ex rel. Humis-ton v. Meyers, 61 Wn.2d 772 , 380 P.2d 735 (1963).”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “In view of the three large mortgage balances payable over a long period of time, again the trier of the facts [in valuing the apartments] could take such factors [as future demand for apartment type housing and the fact these apartments were constructed of wood] into consideration in exercising the wide discretion allowed him.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “Thus, in making a division of the property the law does not impel an equal or exact division of the community property of the parties. The disposition only need be just and equitable, and wide latitude and discretionary powers are vested in the trial court in order to accomplish this division.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.