74 Wash. App. 133 - State v. Freitag’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
12 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 106 Wash. 2d 514 - State v. Nordby · 106 Wash. 2d 547 - State v. Armstrong · 108 Wash. 2d 125 - State v. Pascal · 108 Wash. 2d 458 - State v. McAlpin · 117 Wash. 2d 156 - State v. Allert
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“0” offender score does not include a complete absence of convictions. If the majority’s position that the complete absence of misdemeanors constitutes a mitigating circumstance because the”
2 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ha'mim · State v. Ha'Mim““(1) Ensure that the punishment for a criminal offense is proportionate to the seriousness of the offense and the offender’s criminal history; (2) Promote respect for the law by providing punishment which is just; (3) Be commensurate with the punishment imposed on others committing similar offenses; (4) Protect the public; (5) Offer the offender an opportunity to improve him or herself; and (6) Make frugal use of the state’s resources.” Wash. Rev. Code § 9 .94A.010.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“[t]he complete lack of misdemeanors, beyond the absence of felonies that renders a zero offender score ... is appropriate for the sentencing judge to consider, in that it supports a finding that the defendant lacked the predisposition to commit the crimes.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Ha'mim
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.