74 Wash. App. 264 - State v. Lopez’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 103 Wash. 2d 1 - State v. Campbell · 102 Wash. 2d 68 - Davis v. Globe MacHine Manufacturing Co. · Riddell v. Rhay, Penitentiary Superintendent · Roscoe v. Arizona
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he ordinary rule... is that a defendant who asks for a continuance pursuant to CrR 3.3(h) simply will not be heard to later complain that he received what he asked for”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.