74 Wash. App. 281 - State v. Reid’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
15 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently June 2017
15 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Sandstrom v. Montana · County Court of Ulster Cty. v. Allen · Francis v. Franklin · Cree v. Goldstein · 110 Wash. 2d 403 - State v. Kitchen
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Aggregation of individual transactions to meet the threshold for a particular degree of theft is allowed by common law and by statute. The common law allows aggregation of a series of thefts, so long as the thefts are from the same owner and the same place and result from a single criminal impulse pursuant to a gen eral larcenous scheme. The common law also allows aggregation of thefts from the same victim over a period of time or from several victims at the same time and place, if the takings are part of a common scheme or plan. But, the common law does not allow aggregation of thefts from different victims at different times and places.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Garman“successive takings are the result of a single, continuing criminal impulse or intent and are pursuant to the execution of a general larcenous scheme or plan, such successive takings constitute a single larceny regardless of the time which may elapse between each taking.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Dash“One who acts fraudulently, however, may be imprisoned because he or she is punished for the wrong which has been perpetrated, not for the failure to pay.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mermis
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.