State v. Bryant’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently May 2013
5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 120 Wash. 2d 585 - State v. Greenwood · 87 Wash. 2d 870 - State v. Striker · 119 Wash. 2d 284 - State v. Handburgh · 52 Wash. App. 380 - State v. Hunnel · 39 Wash. App. 550 - State v. Wirth
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“there is an unnecessary delay between the filing of an information and the defendant's arraignment, a constructive arraignment date 14 days after the filing of the information is established.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Frank“[A]ny delay caused by the defendant's fault or connivance is excluded from the defendant's time for trial calculations under the Striker rule.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Frank“the State was entitled to assume that Bryant was well aware of his arraignment date and that his failure to appear was volitional.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Frank
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.