State v. Kleist’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
May 1995
most recently cited
2 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 94 Wash. 2d 216 - State v. Green · 13 Wash. App. 782 - State v. Clark · 19 Wash. App. 549 - State v. Coleman · 57 Wash. App. 207 - State v. Farrer
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The value of an item at a particular retail outlet includes, in addition to the intrinsic value of the item, certain intangibles related to the specific outlet where the item is sold, including the store’s reputation, ambience, and the nature and extent of precautions taken against shoplifting. Because these intangibles vary, the price at which the same goods are sold at another store is not relevant so long as evidence is available to establish their price at the store from which they were stolen.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“"Value” means the market value of the property or services at the time and in the approximate area of the criminal act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.