74 Wash. App. 835 - State v. Coleman’s Empirical Analysis
1994
Citation profile
7 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently August 2018
7 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Young · 265 N.J. Super. 351 - State v. Acker · State v. Acker · 16 Wash. App. 18 - State v. Trickel · 62 Wash. App. 914 - State v. Powell
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we cannot second guess you, ... and if you determine that the only thing that happened here was a theft then that is your judgment.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Finch“tempered by her immediately preceding comments that'we cannot second guess you, and we will not second guess you.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“telling the jury it would violate its oath if it disagreed with the State's theory of the evidence”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.