Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 Wis. 2d 303 - Snajder v. State

74 Wis. 2d 303 - Snajder v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

58
cited by 58 later decisions
5
states following
June 2020
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 58 later decisions — most recently June 2020 · most notably 84 Wis. 2d 57 - Van Ermen v. Department of Health & Social Services (1978), 95 Wis. 2d 115 - State Ex Rel. Meeks v. Gagnon (1980)

3 federal appellate · 51 state decisions

220197619801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Morrissey v. Brewer · 50 Wis. 2d 540 - State Ex Rel. Johnson v. Cady · Meehan v. Macy · 65 Wis. 2d 207 - State v. Goulette · State Ex Rel. Ball v. McPhee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 58 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““ ‘(1) Whether the board kept within its jurisdiction; (2) whether it acted according to law; (3) whether its action was arbitrary, oppressive, or unreasonable and represented its will and not its judgment; and (4) whether the evidence was such that it might reasonably make the order or determination in question.’ ””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[s]uch a hearing is analogous to allowing a second trial to 'shore up' the record to support the judgment.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “also ordered a second hearing where the record could be supplemented by additional evidence”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.