Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 74 Wis. 2d 675 - State v. Becker

74 Wis. 2d 675 - State v. Becker’s Empirical Analysis

1976

Citation profile

41
cited by 41 later decisions
3
states following
May 2018
most recently cited

39 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 41 later decisions — most recently May 2018 · most notably 80 Wis. 2d 305 - State v. Avery (1977), 168 Wis. 2d 453 - State v. Annala (1992)

39 state decisions

22019761980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Gault · Kent v. United States · State Ex Rel. Koopman v. Waukesha Co. Ct. Judges · 348 F. Supp. 764 - Miller v. Quatsoe

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 41 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[W]hen the charging authorities have reason to believe that a child has committed an offense which, if committed by an adult, constitutes a crime, jurisdiction in a criminal court cannot be maintained on a charge brought after the child becomes eighteen, unless it is affirmatively shown that the delay was not for the purpose of manipulating the system to avoid juvenile court jurisdiction.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]dministrators of a state juvenile system may not manipulate administrative procedures so as to avoid state and constitutional procedural rights meant to protect juveniles.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “a deliberate effort to avoid juvenile court jurisdiction.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.