74 Wis. 2d 79 - Edwards v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1976
Citation profile
33 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 33 later decisions — most recently May 2019 · most notably 83 Wis. 2d 790 - Huggett v. State (1978), 151 Cal. App. 3d 1128 - People v. Pointer (1984)
33 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 3 Cal. 3d 100 - In Re Antazo · 71 Cal. 2d 388 - In Re Allen · 57 Wis. 2d 611 - State v. Gerard · In Re Mannino · 124 Ga. App. 190 - Inman v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 33 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“may impinge upon constitutional rights as long as they are not overly broad and are reasonably related to [his] rehabilitation.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“is granted with the goals of rehabilitation and protection of society in mind.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““3.2 Nature and determination of conditions. “(a) It should be a condition of every sentence to probation that the probationer lead a law-abiding life during the period of his probation. No other conditions should be required by statute; but the sentencing court should be authorized to prescribe additional conditions to fit the circumstances of each case. Development of standard conditions as a guide to sentencing courts is appropriate so long as such conditions are not routinely imposed. “(b) Conditions imposed by the court should be designed to assist the probationer in leading a law-abiding life. They should be reasonably related to his rehabilitation and not unduly restrictive of his liberty or incompatible with his freedom of religion. They should not be so vague or ambiguous as to give no real guidance. “(c) Conditions may appropriately deal with matters such as the following: “(i) cooperating with a program of supervision; “(ii) meeting family responsibilities; “(iii) maintaining steady employment or engaging or refraining from engaging in a specific employment or occupation; “(iv) pursuing prescribed educational or vocational training; Í “(v) undergoing available medical or psychiatric treatment; “(vi) maintaining residence in a prescribed area or in a special facility established for or available to persons on probation; “(vii) refraining from consorting with certain types of people or frequenting certain types of places; “(viii) making restitution of the fruits of t”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.