Slyusar v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
740 F.3d 1068 · 2014
Citation profile
5 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1158 (§ 208 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Immigration & Naturalization Service v. Ventura · Nken v. Holder · Ren v. Holder · Singh v. Ashcroft · El-Moussa v. Holder
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“any reasonable adjudicator would be compelled to conclude to the contrary.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[W]e wish to emphasize that “[although the REAL ID Act expands the bases on which an IJ may rest an, adverse credibility determination, it does not give a blank cheek to the IJ enabling him or her to insulate an adverse credibility determination from our review of the reasonableness of that determination.” Ren [v. Holder ], 648 F.3d [1079,] 1084 (9th Cir.2011) (quotation omitted). As the Ren Court recognized, “victims of abuse often confuse the details of particular incidents, including the time. or dates of particular assaults and which specific actions occurred on which specific occasion; thus, the ability to recall precise dates of events years after they happen is an extremely poor test of how truthful a witness’s substantive account is.” Id. at 1085-86 (internal citations and quotation marks omitted).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“base a credibility determination on the demeanor, candor, or responsiveness of the applicant ... [,] the inherent plausibility of the applicant’s ... account, the consistency between the applicant’s ... written and oral statements ... [,] the internal consistency of each such statement, the consistency of such statements with other evidence of record ... [,] and any inaccuracies or falsehoods in such statements, without regard to whether an inconsistency, inaccuracy, or falsehood goes to the heart of the applicant’s claim, or any other relevant factor.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.