Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 740 F.3d 1088 - Chasensky v. Walker

Chasensky v. Walker’s Empirical Analysis

740 F.3d 1088 · 2014

Citation profile

17
cited by 17 later decisions
January 2025
most recently cited

5 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 11 U.S.C. § 525 · 28 U.S.C. § 1291

Relies on Ashcroft v. Iqbal · Mitchell v. Forsyth · Pearson v. Callahan · Elrod v. Burns · Hope v. Pelzer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “because a plaintiff's new complaint wipes away prior pleadings, [and, therefore,] the amended complaint opens the door for defendants to raise new and previously unmentioned affirmative defenses.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “plaintiff carries the burden of defeating the qualified immunity defense.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.