Spaulding v. Conopco, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
740 F.3d 1187 · 2014
Citation profile
2
cited by 2 later decisions
September 2016
most recently cited
Relationships
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Erie Co v. Tompkins · Scott v. Harris · Murphy v. Missouri Department of Corrections
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“a stroke and two brain surgeries[.]” See Spaulding v. Conopco, Inc., 740 F.3d 1187, 1196 (8th Cir.2014) (“We consider only admissible evidence and disregard portions of various affidavits and depositions that ... purport! ] to state legal conclusions as fact.” (alterations in original) (citation and internal quotation marks omitted)); cf. Salgado v. Atl. Richfield Co., 823 F.2d 1322 , 1327 (9th Cir.1987) (instructing district court to ignore party’s”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.