Perez v. Holder’s Empirical Analysis
740 F.3d 57 · 2014
Citation profile
13 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Applies 8 U.S.C. § 1182 (§ 212 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter)) · 8 U.S.C. § 1252 (§ 242 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Stone v. Immigration & Naturalization Service · Missouri v. Jenkins · Sevoian v. Ashcroft · COELHO · Fesseha v. Ashcroft
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'introduce new, material evidence that was not available at the original merits hearing.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“BIA committed an error of law or exercised its judgment in an arbitrary, capricious, or irrational way.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Medina v. Whitaker“[e]vidence is not material unless it has some impact on the outcome of a petitioner's underlying case.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Qorane v. Barr
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.