Davis v. Charnes’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Creech v. STATE, DEPT. OF REV., MOTOR VEHICLE DIV. · Aultman v. Motor Vehicle Division, Department of Revenue · Marek v. State, Department of Revenue, Motor Vehicle Division · Schocke v. ST., DEPT. OF REV., MOTOR VEH. DIV.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“Intoxilyzer test results are presumed accurate if the test was conducted by a certified operator in accordance with Health Department regulations on a machine shown to be operating correctly at the time of the test.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.