Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 740 So. 2d 1147 - Wright v. State

740 So. 2d 1147 - Wright v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
October 2009
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on North Star Steel Co. v. Thomas · Midland Central Appraisal District v. Midland Industrial Service Corp. · Martinez-Villareal v. Arizona · Toski v. McDonnell · Grivetti v. Scott

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"Neither a copy of the charges against the defendant nor the `given' written instructions shall go into the jury room; provided, however, that the court may, in its discretion, submit the written charges to the jury in a complex case."”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.