Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 740 SO2D 346 - Pearson v. State

Pearson v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

1
cited by 1 later decisions
1
states following
April 2002
most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Strickland v. Washington · 503 So. 2d 803 - Wetz v. State · 716 So. 2d 1083 - Gleeton v. State · 525 So. 2d 776 - Carney v. State · 644 So. 2d 451 - Moody v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 1 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[A]mendments which seek to change the name or description of a person to which the indictment refers”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “correctly name the person intended by the grand jury.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.