Farah v. Canada’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

cited by 8 later decisions

states following

May 2019

most recently cited

1 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 462 So. 2d 1 - American Medical Intern. v. Scheller · 367 So. 2d 253 - West v. Troelstrup · 575 So. 2d 673 - Cedar Hills Properties Corp. v. Eastern Federal Corp. · 606 So. 2d 393 - McKinney-Green, Inc. v. Davis

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

“[A] plaintiff must prove that a third party interfered with a contract by `influencing, inducing or coercing one of the parties to ... breach the contract....'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
e.g. 387 F. Supp. 3d 1318 - Westgate Resorts, Ltd. v. Sussman · 832 So. 2d 810 - Chicago Title Ins. Co. v. Alday-Donalson Title Co. of Fla., Inc.
“The elements of the tort of intentional interference [with a contract] [under Florida law] are: 1) the contract; 2) the wrongdoer's knowledge thereof; 3) his intentional procurement of its breach; 4) the absence of justification; and 5) damages.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. McRaney v. N. Am. Mission Bd. of the S. Baptist Convention, Inc.
“that the breach by the party to the contract rather th[a]n the persuasion by the defendant was the proximate cause of the plaintiff's damage.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
e.g. 387 F. Supp. 3d 1318 - Westgate Resorts, Ltd. v. Sussman

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.