¶1In this action for damages, at a case management conference, the trial court instructed the parties to “set down” a hearing in ten days. After the ten days expired, and no hearing had been “set down,” the trial court dismissed the case without prejudice, which may be the equivalent of a dismissal with prejudice because of the statute of limitations. We reverse the order because it does not contain “an express finding of a willful or deliberate refusal to obey a court order” which is a requisite for the sanction of dismissal. Commonwealth Fed. Sav. and Loan Ass’n v. Tubero, 569 So.2d 1271, 1272 (Fla.1990). Nor do we think, even if there had been such a finding, dismissal would have been justified. Reversed.
740 So. 2d 580
Leonardo v. Grimming
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 21, 1999
District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-07-21
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 2002
1 state decisions
Relies on 569 So. 2d 1271 - Commonwealth Fed. Sav. & Loan Ass'n v. Tubero
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1999-07-21
View the full empirical analysis of this case →