Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 740 SO2D 59 - Casey v. Cohan

Casey v. Cohan’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
June 2023
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 2023

6 state decisions

301999200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 135 So. 2d 876 - Ramel v. Chasebrook Construction Company · Pryor v. Oak Ridge Development Corp. · 727 So. 2d 1053 - Hillcrest Pacific Corp. v. Yamamura · 480 So. 2d 1328 - Atlantic Nat. Bank of Florida v. Vest · 710 So. 2d 984 - Billian v. Mobil Corp.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “) appeals a final judgment awarding appellee Gary Minker $10,550 in damages, along with pre-judgment interest and costs. Finding competent, substantial evidence to support the damage award, we affirm. After a bench trial, the judge found that a contract implied in fact existed between Minker and Gem for Minker to provide the corporation with consulting services. In a non-jury trial, it is the obligation of the trial judge to reconcile conflicts, to determine the credibility of witnesses, and to evaluate the reasonableness and weight of the evidence presented. An appellate court must accept”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “a determination of facts made by the trial judge where the record discloses testimony from which the trial judge could have determined the facts....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.