Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 740 SO2D 858 - Miller v. State

Miller v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

30
cited by 30 later decisions
2
states following
January 2018
most recently cited

30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 30 later decisions — most recently January 2018 · most notably 771 So. 2d 883 - Spann v. State (2000), 891 So. 2d 179 - Montgomery v. State (2004)

30 state decisions

180199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · 681 So. 2d 521 - Hoops v. State · Foster v. State · 671 So. 2d 581 - Walker v. State · 660 So. 2d 1285 - Gossett v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 30 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “"It is well settled in this [S]tate [ ... ] that a change in the indictment is permissible if it does not materially alter facts which are the essence of the offense on the face of the indictment as it originally stood or materially alter a defense to the indictment as it originally stood so as to prejudice the defendant's case."”
    10 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “So long as the court applies the correct legal standards, we will not overturn a finding of fact made by a trial judge unless it be clearly erroneous or contrary to the overwhelming weight of the evidence. Where, on conflicting evidence, the lower court admits a statement into evidence this Court generally must affirm.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “burden is met and a prima facie case made out by testimony of an officer, or other persons having knowledge of the facts, that the confession was voluntarily made without any threats, coercion, or offer of reward.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.