State v. Briggs’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently June 2009
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on State v. Mentola · State v. Gannaway · State v. Goodman · State v. MacE · State v. Seagraves
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“'Protracted' means something short of permanent but more than of short duration; what is considered protracted depends on the circumstances.” State v. Briggs, 740 S.W.2d 399, 401 (Mo.App. E.D.1987). An injury that causes the lack of full use of a leg or foot, even for as brief a period of time as a week, is sufficient to constitute”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Polson“physical injury that creates a substantial risk of death or that causes serious disfigurement or protracted loss or impairment of the function of any part of the body.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. In Interest of NAG
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.