Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 740 SW2D 60 - Adams v. State

Adams v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
October 2002
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently October 2002

6 state decisions

30198719902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Appellate journey

reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 354th Judicial District Court)

Relationships

Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Griffith v. Kentucky · Keeton v. State · Henry v. State · Rodgers v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The State may, but should not be required to explain the reasons for its exercise of peremptory strikes merely out of an abundance of caution, but only after a finding of prima facie discrimination has been made.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.