Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 741 F.2d 1406 - McCarthy v. Kleindienst

McCarthy v. Kleindienst’s Empirical Analysis

741 F.2d 1406 · 1984

Citation profile

139
cited by 139 later decisions
7
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

36 federal appellate · 46 district · 8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 139 later decisions — most recently May 2025 · most notably 23 Cal. 4th 429 - Linder v. Thrifty Oil Co. (2000), Kenneth Newton (2001)

36 federal appellate · 46 district · 8 state decisions

57019841990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Mt. Healthy City School District Board of Education v. Doyle · City of Los Angeles v. Lyons · Eisen v. Carlisle & Jacquelin · General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. Falcon · Coopers & Lybrand v. Livesay

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 139 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) the class is so numerous that joinder of all members is impracticable, (2) there are questions of law or fact common to the class, (3) the claims or defenses of the representative parties are typical of the claims or defenses of the class, and (4) the representative parties will fairly and adequately protect the interests of the class.”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Fundamental fairness, as well as the orderly administration of justice requires that defendants haled into court not remain indefinitely uncertain as to the bedrock litigation fact of the number of individuals or parties to whom they may ultimately be held liable for money damages. That is particularly true where, as here, the defendants were facing either thirty-nine named plaintiffs or a class of almost two hundred times the number of the original plaintiffs. Second, these rules foster the interests of judicial efficiency, as well as the interests of the parties, by encouraging courts to proceed to the merits of a controversy as soon as practicable. That, at bottom, is a matter of simple justice. As previously described, plaintiffs’ three-year delay in moving for class certification indisputably thwarted these policies.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “[I]n addition to ulterior motive, one must allege and prove that there has been a perversion of the judicial process and achievement of some end not contemplated in the regular prosecution of the charge.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.