United States v. Daoud’s Empirical Analysis
741 F.2d 478 · 1984
Citation profile
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently June 2012 · most notably State v. Marshall (1991), State v. Freeland (1986)
9 federal appellate · 1 district · 9 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 21 U.S.C. § 952
Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Chapman v. State of California · Doyle v. Ohio · United States v. Liddy · Fagundes v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““Lower federal courts have extended the Supreme Court’s reasoning in Doyle to an arrestee’s request to secure counsel. The right to counsel is included in the Miranda warnings, and as such is covered by the implicit assurance that invocation of the right will carry no penalty. [Citations omitted.] When the prosecution reveals at trial that a defendant asked for a lawyer after his arrest, courts have looked at all the circumstances under which the disclosure was made in order to determine how seriously in the eyes of the jury it may have penalized defendant’s exercise of his right to counsel. Incidental references have not led to reversal____ Reversal has been ordered, however, when the prosecution has deliberately sought to capitalize on a request for counsel, as by arguing the defendant must have had something to hide if he needed a lawyer before talking to the police.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“The right to counsel is included in the Miranda warnings, and as such is covered by the implicit assurance that invocation of the right will carry no penalty.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“a point of asking the jury to draw a negative inference from”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.