Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 741 F.2d 948 - Johnson v. Heckler

Johnson v. Heckler’s Empirical Analysis

741 F.2d 948 · 1984

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
December 2008
most recently cited

9 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently December 2008

9 federal appellate ·

150198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 405 (§ 205 of the Social Security Act of 1935)

Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Allen v. Weinberger · Cummins v. Schweiker · McNeil v. Califano · Cassiday v. Schweiker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “One-plus edema means edema that is barely detectable, and 4+ edema means edema in which the limbs are swollen to diameters 1.5 to 2 times normal.” A. Guyton, Textbook of Medical Physiology 376 (6th ed. 1981). . Substantial evidence means " ‘more than a mere scintilla. It means such relevant evidence as a reasonable mind might accept as adequate to support a conclusion.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “findings of the Secretary... if supported by substantial evidence, shall be conclusive, and where a claim has been denied by the Secretary... the court shall review only the question of conformity with [the Secretary's] regulations and the validity of such regulations.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “Once the magistrate concluded that substantial evidence did not support the Secretary’s finding that Johnson could return to her past relevant work his scope of review terminated. By proceeding further and determining that Johnson had transferable skills, a determination which the Secretary has found difficult to make, the magistrate usurped a function of the Secretary which was critical to the outcome of Johnson’s claim.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.