Al Janko v. Gates’s Empirical Analysis
741 F.3d 136 · 2014
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 5 district ·
Relationships
Applies 10 U.S.C. § 801 (Military Justice Act of 1968) · 10 U.S.C. § 948A (§ 1802 of the Matthew Shepard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1346 (Federal Tort Claims Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1350 (Torture Victim Protection Act of 1991) · 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 42 U.S.C. § 1985
Relies on Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics · Almendarez-Torres v. United States · United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc. · Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of America · Connecticut National Bank v. Germain
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[N]o court, justice, or judge shall have jurisdiction to hear or consider any [non-habeas] action against the United States or its agents relating to any aspect of the detention, transfer, treatment, trial, or conditions of confinement of an alien who is or was detained by the United States and has been determined by the United States to have been properly detained as an enemy combatant or is awaiting such determination.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Jawad v. Gates“executive-branch tribunals convened to determine the status of Guantanamo detainees.” Janko v. Gates, 741 F.3d 136 , 138 (D.C.Cir.2014); see also Al-Nashiri v. MacDonald, 741 F.3d 1002 , 1004-05 (9th Cir.2013) (discussing Department of Defense orders establishing CSRTs). 3 . The executive branch created ARBs”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Ameur v. Gates
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.