Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 741 NW2D 79 - State v. Bussmann

State v. Bussmann’s Empirical Analysis

2007

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
2
states following
April 2018
most recently cited

20 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Boddie v. Connecticut · Members of the City Council of Los Angeles v. Taxpayers for Vincent · Serbian Eastern Orthodox Diocese for United States and Canada v. Milivojevich · Presbyterian Church in US v. Mary Elizabeth Blue Hull Memorial Presbyterian Church · Jones v. Wolf

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “the actor is or purports to be a member of the clergy, ... and: (i) the sexual penetration occurred during the course of a meeting in which the complainant sought or received religious or spiritual advice, aid, or comfort from the actor in private; or (ii) the sexual penetration occurred during a period of time in which the complainant was meeting on an ongoing basis, with the actor to seek or receive religious or spiritual advice, aid, or comfort in private. Consent by the complainant is not a defense....”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.