Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 741 So. 2d 1234 - Cuevas v. State

741 So. 2d 1234 - Cuevas v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
November 2008
most recently cited

4 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Dixon · United States v. Powell · 444 So. 2d 407 - Marty v. State · 476 So. 2d 165 - State v. Carney · 577 So. 2d 939 - State v. McCloud

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “I suggest that the committee on criminal jury instructions propose an instruction which would advise the jury that when counts involving legally interlocking charges are involved, the jury should first consider the predicate offense and should it find such offense not proved beyond a reasonable doubt, it should acquit also on the compound felony. On the other hand, if the predicate offense is sufficiently proved, then the jury should be instructed to consider the count alleging the compound felony.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
  2. “`an acquittal on one count negates a necessary element for conviction on another count.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.