Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 741 SO2D 366 - Holmes v. O'BRYANT

Holmes v. O'BRYANT’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
April 2011
most recently cited

7 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Allore v. Jewell · Supervisors v. Kennicott · 515 So. 2d 1183 - Mullins v. Ratcliff · 612 So. 2d 359 - Century 21 Deep South Prop., Ltd. v. Corson · Burnett v. Smith

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “A man of sound mind may execute a will or a deed from any sort of motive satisfactory to him, whether that motive be love, affection, gratitude, partiality, prejudice, or even a whim or caprice.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Whenever there is a relationship between two people in which one person is in a position to exercise dominant influence upon the other because of the latter's dependency upon the former, arising either from weakness of mind or body, or through trust, the law does not hesitate to characterize such a relationship as fiduciary in character.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.