Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

741 So. 2d 406

Peelegrine v. Sullivan

Supreme Court of Alabama

Decided September 10, 1999

Supreme Court of Alabama · decided 1999-09-10

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently January 2006

1 state decisions

Relies on 518 So. 2d 682 - Handley v. Richards

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1999-09-10

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

PER CURIAM.

¶1The plaintiff appeals from summary judgments for the defendants in a lawsuit alleging counseling malpractice; alienation of affections; breach of contract; the tort of outrage; vicarious liability; negligent hiring, supervision, and retention; fraud; intentional infliction of emotional distress; breach of fiduciary duty; and loss of consortium. Because our study of the record on appeal discloses no genuine issue of material fact, and because the facts as shown by that record entitle the defendants to judgments as a matter of law, we *407affirm the summary judgments. Rule 56(c), Ala.R.Civ.P.

¶2AFFIRMED.

HOOPER, C.J., and COOK, SEE, LYONS, BROWN, and JOHNSTONE, JJ., concur.MADDOX and HOUSTON, JJ., concur specially.
HOUSTON, Justice

¶3(concurring specially).

¶4I adopt Justice Maddox’s special concurrence in Handley v. Richards, 518 So.2d 682 (Ala.1987).

¶5MADDOX, J., concurs.

/741/so2d/406 · .json · Public domain