Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

741 So. 2d 585

Smith v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided August 27, 1999

District Court of Appeal of Florida · decided 1999-08-27

Relies on 652 So. 2d 409 - Isley v. State · 686 So. 2d 573 - State v. Reyes · Ford v. State

Decided 1999-08-27

PER CURIAM.

¶1We affirm this successive appeal from a denial of a motion to correct a sentence. Because appellant has engaged in frivolous and successive appeals we warn him that if he files another appeal regarding the same issue and conviction that he will be subject to a cancellation of good time credits and other sanctions. See Isley v. State, 652 So.2d 409 (Fla. 5th DCA 1995); Wareham v. State, 678 So.2d 432 (Fla. 5th DCA), rev. den., 686 So.2d 583 (Fla.1996).

¶2AFFIRMED.

DAUKSCH, HARRIS and PETERSON, JJ., concur.
/741/so2d/585 · .json · Public domain