741 So. 2d 894 - McGilberry v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
109
cited by 109 later decisions
2
states following
November 2017
most recently cited
102 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 3006A (Criminal Justice Act)
Relies on Batson v. Kentucky · Griffin v. California · Moran v. Burbine · Ake v. Oklahoma · Purkett v. Elem
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 109 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“A criminal defendant is not entitled to a perfect trial, only a fair trial.”
12 later decisions quote this exact passage“[t]he proceeding shall be conducted by the trial judge before the trial jury as soon as practicable.”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) aid in describing the circumstances around the killing and the corpus delicti; (2) where they describe the location of the body and the cause of death; or (3) where they supplement or clarify witness testimony.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Brink v. State · Lewis v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.