741 So. 2d 960 - Taylor v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
August 2012
most recently cited
7 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Solem v. Helm · 604 So. 2d 280 - Fleming v. State · 585 So. 2d 753 - Reynolds v. State · 618 So. 2d 116 - Stromas v. State · 615 So. 2d 590 - Edwards v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]he court does not err in sentencing the defendant to a greater sentence than that which was offered in the plea bargaining process where the record reflects that the court remained aloof from the bargaining process or was unaware of the bargaining.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“the imposition of a defendant's sentence is within the discretion of the trial court, and generally, this Court will not review the sentence if it is within the statutory limits.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“The rule and the statute clearly establish that the use of pre-sentence investigations and reports is discretionary with the trial judge and is not mandatory. A defendant does not have a right to a pre-sentence investigation.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.