Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 741 SW2D 74 - State v. Cox

State v. Cox’s Empirical Analysis

1987

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 2019
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Mitchell · State v. Handley · State v. Cantrell · State v. McKinley · State v. Wells

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he difficulty with defendant’s position is that he did not introduce any evidence, by deed or otherwise, showing that he held legal title, or even color of title, to that portion of the road which he admittedly damaged. He offered no evidence showing the location of his true boundary line. He offered no evidence concerning the location of the damaged portion of the road with reference to his true boundary line. In short, although defendant may have believed that he had a right to plow the road, he adduced no evidence showing reasonable grounds for that belief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.