Cook v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1987
Citation profile
35 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently December 2012 · most notably McDuff v. State (1997), Fuller v. State (1992)
35 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Barker v. Wingo · Gideon v. Wainwright · United States v. Wade
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“It has long been noted that none of these four criteria have ‘talismanic qualities,’ and that a showing of prejudice is not sine qua non to demonstrating a denial of the right of speedy trial. Davison v. State, 510 S.W.2d 316, 319 (Tex.Crim.App.1974). See also Moore v. Arizona, 414 U.S. 25 , 94 S.Ct. 188 , 38 L.Ed.2d 183 (1973). These factors are to be considered together, and each case is to be judged on an ad hoc basis. Barker, [407 U.S.] at 530, 533 [ 92 S.Ct. at 2192, 2193 ]....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Hernandez“Where a defect of constitutional magnitude has not been established at the time of trial, the failure of counsel to object does not constitute waiver.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Mathews v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.