Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 742 F.2d 129 - Keeten v. Garrison

Keeten v. Garrison’s Empirical Analysis

742 F.2d 129 · 1984

Citation profile

61
cited by 61 later decisions
3
cited 3 times by the Supreme Court
16
states following
December 1999
most recently cited

22 federal appellate · 1 district · 30 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Witherspoon v. Illinois · Lockett v. Ohio · Rose v. Lundy · Smith v. Phillips · Taylor v. Louisiana

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 61 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Although the right to a jury trial includes the right to a jury venire drawn from a representative cross-section of the community, it does not include the right to be tried by jurors who are unable or unwilling to follow the law and the instructions of the trial judge in a capital case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[i]t indicates only that a death-qualified jury might favor the prosecution and that a nondeath-qualified jury might favor the defendant.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““unmistakably clear (1) that they would automatically vote against the imposition of capital punishment without regard to any evidence that might be developed at the trial of the case before them, or (2) that their attitude toward the death penalty would prevent them from making an impartial decision as to the defendant’s guilt.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the concurrence

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.