Hayden v. McDonald’s Empirical Analysis
742 F.2d 423 · 1984
Citation profile
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently August 2001
4 federal appellate · 1 district · 5 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 771 (CAN-SPAM Act of 2003) · 15 U.S.C. § 77B (§ 2 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77L (§ 12 of the Securities Act of 1933) · 15 U.S.C. § 77N (§ 14 of the Securities Act of 1933)
Relies on Securities & Exchange Commission v. W. J. Howey Co. · Securities & Exchange Commission v. C. M. Joiner Leasing Corp. · Babich v. United States · Nogueras v. Puerto Rico International Airlines, Inc. · Norfolk & Western Railway Co. v. Liepelt
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“implicitly construing the 'income' language in a federal securities statute to include tax considerations.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Dr. Roger E. Austin, Dr. Tom W. Anderson, Dr. Myrel A. Neumann, and Dr. William C. Randall v. B.J. Loftsgaarden Alotel Incorporated, a Minnesota Corporation Property Development and Research Company, a Minnesota Corporation and 2361 Building Corporation, Dr. Roger E. Austin, Dr. Tom W. Anderson, Dr. Myrel A. Neumann, and Dr. William C. Randall v. B.J. Loftsgaarden Alotel Incorporated, a Minnesota Corporation, M.S. Noah John W. Burg Lyman H. Coult Robert R. Dunlap, Property Development & Research Company a Minnesota Corporation and 2361 Building Corporation, Dr. Roger E. Austin, Dr. Tom W. Anderson, Dr. Myrel A. Neumann and Dr. William C. Randall v. B.J. Loftsgaarden Alotel Incorporated, a Minnesota Corporation, M.S. Noah John W. Burg Lyman H. Coult Robert R. Dunlap, Property Development & Research Company a Minnesota Corporation and 2361 Building Corporation · Austin v. Bj Loftsgaarden“the consideration paid for the security together with interest”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Dr. Roger E. Austin, Dr. Tom W. Anderson, Dr. Myrel A. Neumann, and Dr. William C. Randall v. B.J. Loftsgaarden Alotel Incorporated, a Minnesota Corporation Property Development and Research Company, a Minnesota Corporation and 2361 Building Corporation, Dr. Roger E. Austin, Dr. Tom W. Anderson, Dr. Myrel A. Neumann, and Dr. William C. Randall v. B.J. Loftsgaarden Alotel Incorporated, a Minnesota Corporation, M.S. Noah John W. Burg Lyman H. Coult Robert R. Dunlap, Property Development & Research Company a Minnesota Corporation and 2361 Building Corporation, Dr. Roger E. Austin, Dr. Tom W. Anderson, Dr. Myrel A. Neumann and Dr. William C. Randall v. B.J. Loftsgaarden Alotel Incorporated, a Minnesota Corporation, M.S. Noah John W. Burg Lyman H. Coult Robert R. Dunlap, Property Development & Research Company a Minnesota Corporation and 2361 Building Corporation · Austin v. Bj Loftsgaarden“less the amount of any income received * * *.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Dr. Roger E. Austin, Dr. Tom W. Anderson, Dr. Myrel A. Neumann, and Dr. William C. Randall v. B.J. Loftsgaarden Alotel Incorporated, a Minnesota Corporation Property Development and Research Company, a Minnesota Corporation and 2361 Building Corporation, Dr. Roger E. Austin, Dr. Tom W. Anderson, Dr. Myrel A. Neumann, and Dr. William C. Randall v. B.J. Loftsgaarden Alotel Incorporated, a Minnesota Corporation, M.S. Noah John W. Burg Lyman H. Coult Robert R. Dunlap, Property Development & Research Company a Minnesota Corporation and 2361 Building Corporation, Dr. Roger E. Austin, Dr. Tom W. Anderson, Dr. Myrel A. Neumann and Dr. William C. Randall v. B.J. Loftsgaarden Alotel Incorporated, a Minnesota Corporation, M.S. Noah John W. Burg Lyman H. Coult Robert R. Dunlap, Property Development & Research Company a Minnesota Corporation and 2361 Building Corporation · Austin v. Bj Loftsgaarden
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.