Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

742 F.2d 628

Docket No. 84-806.

Sullivan v. United States

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit

Decided Sept. 6, 1984.

United States Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · decided 1984-09-06

4 counsel of record

Relies on Sullivan v. United States

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1984-09-06

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2002

80198419902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Robert A. Reutershan, Washington, D.C., argued for appellant. With him on the brief were Richard K. Willard, Acting Asst. Atty. Gen., and David M. Cohen, Washington, D.C., Director.

¶2Roxanne Ando, Washington, D.C., of Office of the Gen. Counsel Dept, of Educ., of counsel.

¶3John Salter, Washington, D.C., of Office of the Gen. Counsel Office of Personnel Management.

¶4Steven M. Schneebaum, Washington, D.C., argued for appellee. With him on the brief was Lisa A. Shapiro, Washington, D.C.

¶5Before MARKEY, Chief Judge, and RICH, and BENNETT, Circuit Judges.

¶6PER CURIAM.

¶7This is an appeal from the United States Claims Court which granted plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and denied defendant’s motion to dismiss this claim for severance pay. We affirm.

¶8OPINION

¶9The judgment appealed from is affirmed on the basis of the opinion filed by the Claims Court. Sullivan v. United States, 4 Cl.Ct. 70 (1983).

¶10AFFIRMED.

/742/f2d/628 · .json · Public domain