Wilson v. Henderson’s Empirical Analysis
742 F.2d 741 · 1984
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions (1 by the Supreme Court) — most recently June 2016
10 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2255 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Katz v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Aguilar v. Texas · Chimel v. California · Payton v. New York
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[s]ubtly and slowly, but surely, Lee's ongoing verbal intercourse with [respondent] served to exacerbate [respondent's] already troubled state of mind.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kuhlmann v. Wilson“[a]s soon as Wilson arrived and viewed the garage, he became upset and stated that 'someone's messing with me.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Kuhlmann v. Wilson“transformed conduct that we formerly held to be constitutional into conduct that is now unconstitutional.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the dissente.g. Kuhlmann v. Wilson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.