Vosgien v. Persson’s Empirical Analysis
742 F.3d 1131 · 2014
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 18 U.S.C. § 924 · 28 U.S.C. § 2244 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996) · 28 U.S.C. § 2254 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)
Relies on Bailey v. United States · Schlup v. Delo · Bousley v. United States · McCleskey v. Zant · Herrera v. Collins
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“show[s] in light of subsequent case law that he cannot, as a legal matter, have committed the alleged crime.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. McCants v. Alves
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.