Robins v. Spokeo, Inc.’s Empirical Analysis
742 F.3d 409 · 2014
Citation profile
10 federal appellate · 4 district ·
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1681 · 15 U.S.C. § 1681B · 15 U.S.C. § 1681N
Relies on Lujan v. Defenders of Wildlife · Warth v. Seldin · Friends of the Earth Incorporateds v. Laidlaw Environmental Services Inc · Safeco Insurance Co. of America v. Burr · DiamlerChrysler Corp v Cuno
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 52 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“alleged violations of [his] statutory rights [were] sufficient to satisfy the injury-in-fact requirement of Article III.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“personal interests in the handling of his credit information are individualized rather than collective,”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence“(a) In general Any person who is negligent in failing to comply with any requirement imposed under this subchapter with respect to any consumer is liable to that consumer in an amount equal to the sum of— (1) any actual damages sustained by the consumer as a result of the failure; and (2) in the case of any successful action to enforce any liability under this section, the costs of the action together with reasonable attorney’s fees as determined by the court.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.