United States v. Harmon’s Empirical Analysis
742 F.3d 451 · 2014
Citation profile
2 federal appellate · 2 district · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1291
Relies on Terry v. Ohio · Brady v. State of Maryland · United States v. Bagley · Giglio v. United States · Whren v. United States
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“federal courts must predict how [it would do so] in light of existing state court opinions, comparable statutes, and decisions from other jurisdictions.” United States v. Harmon, 742 F.3d 451, 456 (10th Cir.2014); see also U.S. v. Ruiz, 589 F.3d 1310, 1313 (10th Cir.2009).”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[Wle must analyze objectively all the surrounding facts and cir cumstances to determine whether the officer had reasonable suspicion that a violation of the applicable statute had occurred.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.