Davis v. Frapolly’s Empirical Analysis
1990
Citation profile
10
cited by 10 later decisions
2
states following
June 2009
most recently cited
2 federal appellate · 4 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on United States v. Kubrick · Schiavone v. Fortune · Doe ex rel. Doe v. St. Joseph's Hospital of Fort Wayne · Wood v. Worachek · Mescall v. Burrus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 10 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[t]hose who may benefit from a statute of limitation can have no part in preventing a potential claimant from learning their identity.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“civil action” includes any action, whether based upon the common law or statutes or Constitution of this State. 745 ILCS 10/8-101. 2 . We note that should the plaintiff identify the individual deputy sheriff implicated in Counts I and II, the relation back doctrine of Rule 15(c) will not apply to any amendment of these two counts. This is because Foster's failure to name the individual deputy sheriff in the original complaint did not arise out of any sort of "mistake”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.